D25299: Composite without timer on swap events

David Edmundson noreply at phabricator.kde.org
Thu Dec 12 09:21:00 GMT 2019


davidedmundson added a comment.


  Urgh, no.
  
  I had an unsubmitteed comment for moving forwards.
  
  This patch takes 1 step backwards in order to eventually go 2 steps forward.
  A perfectly sensible strategy, but I don't like having master that goes backwards without a completely solid plan to go forward.
  The risk of things not getting completed and us releasing something that makes things worse are too high.
  
  But I don't want to hold this up, so in order to resolve this in a way where we can all keep moving forward, I have a proposal:
  
  - I'll approve it, but we merge this commit as-is into a feature branch, rather than master
  - We can then then do the next review based on that branch
  - We can work, hack, rebase and submit reviews on that branch (and vlad and I can help run and rebase it and whatever)
  - Master stays "sunny"
  
  Then when we have the vsync timer we can merge this all into master. Everyone wins.

REPOSITORY
  R108 KWin

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D25299

To: romangg, #kwin
Cc: kwin, davidedmundson, zzag, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, sbergeron, jraleigh, fbampaloukas, GB_2, mkulinski, ragreen, jackyalcine, iodelay, crozbo, bwowk, ZrenBot, ngraham, alexeymin, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, romangg, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kwin/attachments/20191212/34761f3d/attachment.html>


More information about the kwin mailing list