[Kst] pixel type marker missing in Kst 2.x (as opposed to 1.6/1.7) ?

[Daniel Mader]

Dear Nicolas,

thank you very very much for this, it is exactly what we needed! Very well done! The build process was painless, even the packaging straightforward. Beautiful!

Have a good day, and very best regards from Munich,
Daniel



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Hi Daniel,

I've just added a new point type consisting of a single point. I pushed it to git a few minutes ago.
Please test and tell me if that's what you had in mind. It looks very much like kst 1.x as far as I could see.
Also note that according to the zoom level, different points may be superimposed on your screen.

Best regards,

Nicolas

----- Mail original -----
> 
> Good morning Barth,
> 
> thanks for getting back to me!
> 
> As for the feature, in 2.x there are only larger points available now, 
> i.e. complex markers such as squares, circles, and characters, but no 
> 'pixel' marker. This was well available in the 1.x series.
> 
> With Python's matplotlib, you'd get this marker style like this.
> 
> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
> fig = plt.figure(figsize=(20,20))
> ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
> ax1.grid()
> ax1.plot(range(1024), range(1024), ',') # <=== mind the comma!
> fig.suptitle('fig title')
> ax1.set_title('ax title')
> ax1.set_xlabel('xlabel')
> ax1.set_ylabel('ylabel')
> ax1.set_xlim(left=None, right=None)
> ax1.set_ylim(bottom=None, top=None)
> ax1.legend(loc='best', numpoints=1)
> fig.show()
> fig.savefig('test.pdf')
> 
> It is incredibly usefull if you need maximum resolution in order to 
> prevent dots from overlapping. In our case, if you test a CCD for dirt 
> or broken pixels and display this on a screen, it is the only way that 
> makes sense...
> 
> Any suggestions would be deeply appreciated!
>