[Kst] extragear/graphics/kst/src/libkstmath

[barth.netterfield at utoronto.ca]

So am I right in concluding that you have just increased line widths by 
2000/800 in all cases?

If so, I am curious to know the motivation for this.  Was line with = 2 not a 
~2pt line when printed?  Or was it desired to not be able to make a 2pt wide 
line?

Quoting Andrew Walker <arwalker at sumusltd.com>:

> From trial and error to give the best output when printing.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Staikos [mailto:staikos at kde.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 5:43 AM
> To: kst at kde.org
> Subject: Re: [Kst] extragear/graphics/kst/src/libkstmath
> 
> 
> On Thursday 01 June 2006 12:00, Andrew Walker wrote:
> 
> >  int KstPainter::lineWidthAdjustmentFactor() const {
> > -  const QRect& w(window());
> > -  /* For square windows, the line width is in units of 0.1% of window
> size
> > */ -  /* For printing to Letter or A10, line width is ~in points */
> > -  const int factor = (w.width() + w.height()) / 2000;
> > +  int factor = 1;
> > +
> > +  if (type() == P_PRINT || type() == P_EXPORT) {
> > +    const QRect& w(window());
> > +
> > +    factor = (w.width() + w.height()) / 800;
> 
>    Where does this number come from?  The previous algorithm was
> documented,
> and was even explicitly documented:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r520834 | staikos | 2006-03-20 17:58:11 -0500 (Mon, 20 Mar 2006) | 2 lines
> 
> document the magic number and increment it by one
> 
> 
>    Please document the new approach.  Thanks.
> 
> --
> George Staikos
> KDE Developer				http://www.kde.org/
> Staikos Computing Services Inc.		http://www.staikos.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Kst mailing list
> Kst at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kst
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kst mailing list
> Kst at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kst
>