[Kst] In offset mode, [0] location

[Barth Netterfield]

This looks like a bug.  The base value should be the one with the most zeros 
at the end...  not 18.  It should be logged as a bug for fixing in 1.2.1.

cbn

On February 6, 2006 08:20 am, Marc-Antoine Miville-Deschenes wrote:
> Just to make sure everybody understands what I mean, here's a jpeg.
> In that figure I was expecting to have "Sun Nov 7 2004 18:32:00
> [seconds]" at the bottom
> and the [0] put accordingly. It seems that the behavior right now
> is to have the first big tick to be [0] which is not always what you
> expect.