[Kst] Indexed access into vectors ?

[Matthew D Truch]

>   How about something like  @vector[index]  @vector[range]  
> @vector[range,index,range,range,index,...] ?

That's ok, but what happened to the [vector[n]] notation as suggested a
while ago?  Are the nested square brackets too hard to parse?  I can't
think of a case where [vector[n]] is ambiguous, though.  Is there one?

-- 
"Only two things are infinite, the universe, and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former -- Einstein."
--------------------------
Matthew Truch
Department of Physics
Brown University
matt at truch.net
http://matt.truch.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kst/attachments/20050705/951ded2a/attachment.pgp