[Kst] Regression Test Results

[George Staikos]

Anyone have comments on this?  Does the format look OK? How often should I run 
this?  It's all automated with shell scripts and I can set a cronjob to run 
daily, every other day, weekly or some other strange combination.  I'm 
running the tests on gcc3 x86-32, and I occasionally run them manually on 
gcc2 ppc32.  If someone wants to run test on 64 bit, I can help set you up 
with scripts.  My 64bit machine is now repurposed.

There are still lots of tests to write....  I'd like to be able to start 
working on new code again at some point.

On Monday 29 November 2004 21:29, Kst Regression Test wrote:
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Running test: testeqparser
> ERROR: [2,] doesn't have error handling yet!
> 1 testcases failed in testeqparser
>
> Code coverage:
> eparse.y: Lines executed:94.97% of 159
> escan.l: Lines executed:94.92% of 59
> escan.c: Lines executed:43.09% of 304
> enodes.cpp: Lines executed:91.06% of 414
> enodefactory.cpp: Lines executed:100.00% of 31
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Running test: testhistogram
> Test [Line 57] failed.
> Test [Line 69] failed.
> Test [Line 81] failed.
> Test [Line 105] failed.
> Test [Line 115] failed.
> 5 testcases failed in testhistogram
>
> Code coverage:
> ksthistogram.cpp: Lines executed:50.00% of 228
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Running test: testscalars
> All tests passed!
>
> Code coverage:
> kstscalar.cpp: Lines executed:90.57% of 53
> _______________________________________________
> Kst mailing list
> Kst at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kst

-- 
George Staikos
KDE Developer				http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc.		http://www.staikos.net/