[Kst] [PATCH] Make plugins faster

[Barth Netterfield]

With Andrew's changes....

On November 5, 2004 04:04 pm, Barth Netterfield wrote:
> *If* we can show that it is a significant speedup (>~30%) in at least some
> cases, then, given the long RC1 time scale, I think it can go in. 
> Planck-HFI is by far the most intense plugin user right now, and if they
> need it, they are going to use it, whether we branch before or after the
> change.  And if they use it, then they are certainly going to test it over
> the next couple weeks.  The changes are well isolated and easily revertable
> if we find troubles.
>
> cbn
>
> On November 5, 2004 02:42 pm, George Staikos wrote:
> > On Friday 05 November 2004 14:21, Andrew Walker wrote:
> > > As this is only a performance issue I would
> > > recommend holding off until after the 1.0 release
> > > and we can get more testing time on it.
> >
> >    Depends on how you look at it.  Some of the uses here are very intense
> > on plugins, almost to the point of making Kst unusable on the hardware
> > they have.  Anyway, I'll add ths to a branch if it doesn't go in.
> >
> > > Also, I would feel more comfortable if the
> > > _inStrings and _outStrings are memset
> > > immediately after they are allocated.
> >
> >   Oops, good catch.  It could possibly freeParameters() immediately after
> > creating them, so that might have crashed.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kst mailing list
> Kst at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kst