[Kst] kdeextragear-2/kst/kst

Andrew Walker arwalker at sumusltd.com
Sat May 22 17:36:20 CEST 2004

My preference would be to leave it. Yes, its convenient to
have it when testing the new windowing functionality.
However, by doing this you're not testing the new code in 
context, which I think is a serious concern.

However, if you thing the gains outweigh the disadvantages
then feel free to add it back.


-----Original Message-----
From: George Staikos [mailto:staikos at kde.org]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:10 PM
To: kst at kde.org
Cc: Andrew Walker
Subject: Re: [Kst] kdeextragear-2/kst/kst

On Friday 21 May 2004 16:23, Andrew Walker wrote:
> CVS commit by arwalker:
> Removed test view.

   We [Barth and I] had already discussed not removing this, just renaming it 
and removing the "test" portions when we're done with it.  I am quite 
regularily using those test features because it's much faster than creating 
real plots.  Furthermore, having the extra layer ("TestView") was very useful 
because it allows us to add or swap in widgets very easily.  I think this 
should be added back, and the test functionality can be #ifdef'd.

George Staikos
KDE Developer				http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc.		http://www.staikos.net/

More information about the Kst mailing list