[Kst] Some Benchmarking Results
Barth Netterfield
netterfield at astro.utoronto.ca
Thu Dec 9 04:03:25 CET 2004
Hi,
Based on the feeling that kst-1.0.0 is a little slow, I have done some
benchmarks comparing cvs of today, 0.97, and 0.94. Absolute values are, of
course irrelevant, given the dodgy approach, but relative is intersting:
1) Real time plot of 9 100 Hz fields, 200ms update, dirfile data source:
Total CPU usage (kst, X, everything else)
0.94: 35%
0.97: 30%
CVS: 33%
So in real time operation, we are currently between 0.94 and 0.97.... We have
also deleted a lot of plotting bugs since 0.97, so , this is probably not
surprising.
2) Load and plot 3 10E6 sample fields in three separate plots, and exit:
time:
0.94: 13.8 s
0.97: 12.5 s
CVS: 16.25s
We have regressed a lot in loading/plotting big data files since 0.97. This
is a big problem! Don't know if it is in plotting, or in loading.
cbn
More information about the Kst
mailing list