staikos at kde.org
Sun Jun 15 20:25:35 CEST 2003
On Sunday 15 June 2003 14:17, C. Barth Netterfield wrote:
> How portable is 0.0/0.0 in 2003?
> Under gcc3.2,
> -math.h -> bits/nan.h defines NAN.
> -There is also the C99 function nan(), which returns NaN if quiet NaNs are
> supported. Are quiet NaN's supported on all KDE supported platforms?
I tried that, but it didn't seem to work on gcc 2.95.x. I'll look into it
a bit more.
0.0/0.0 is nan by definition so I think it should be ok. IBM's compiler
documentation actually explicitly says to do it like that too.
KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/
More information about the Kst