[Kroupware] Questions about Kmail IMAP-client

[Bo Thorsen]

=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 18 February 2003 04:42, martin.konold@erfrakon.de wrote:
> On Monday 17 February 2003 06:44, Bo Thorsen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > > It should only take a long time for the first synchronization,
> > > > after that it's only the changes that takes time. The diskspace
> > > > there
> > >
> > > traditional IMAP (like 20 second compared to 5 seconds). This
> > > doesn't
> >
> > Yes, it really is slower for some reason - that's the truth.
>
> Technically there is no reason why offline imap should be slower than
> traditional IMAP in any case.
>
> In addition I have the strong impression that the current imap
> implementation does not use pipelining in order to speed things up.

Correct. We sacrificed this over stability. The problem with the=20
pipelining comes, if you loose the internet connectivity during a sync.=20
We did not so far try to implement anything smart in the sync - we merely=20
made sure it works.

Bo.

=2D --=20

     Bo Thorsen                 |   Praestevejen 4
     Senior Software Engineer   |   5290 Marslev
     Klar=E4lvdalens Datakonsult  |   Denmark
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+UkgnmT99lwfUS5IRAlBxAJ9PoY+rTl0wJlbFKuLNwYYETuppegCdHzhX
ypZvakdVCNNtgyvzc11r7y0=3D
=3Da/Qr
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----