Frame System

[Norman S]

Hi Miguel,

in my opinion it sounds like an extension-module or so. It's an very 
interesting idea, I think. I am looking since some time for some good 
extensions like (basic) animation, enhanced texturing or better merged (and 
documented) scripting (with many examples of course :) ) and so on. But I am 
a simple user only...

Some weeks ago I have designed a little mascot for a local association (and I 
am a member of this association). Maybee I can send you a copy of it...


Bye Norman Schwirz
(I hope my English is not too bad...)


Am Sonntag, 1. Oktober 2006 05:20 schrieb Miguel Angel Gómez Márquez:
> It shouldn't be too hard, i mean, povray already included the clock
> parameter.
>
> I will explain a little bit of what i did with flash, and how could it be
> implemented in Kpovmodeler.
>
> Well, if we  group objects (i am talking about POVRay code) and set them a
> translation and rotation actions with variables , then we would have some
> mobile structures (i used it for aircrafts, and i would gladly send you the
> video).
>
> I used flash and actionscript to report the objects positions and
> orientations each frame, then it generated a TXT  which i would input into
> a parser i made and well this parser turned it into POVRay code (didn't
> have another real option)  and well i got my animation done.
>
> Look:
> #if (clock > 0 )
>  gf1 = 0.000000 ;
>   gf2 = 0.350000 ;
>  gf3 = -0.980922 ;
>   rf2 = 0.000000 ;
> #end
>  #if (clock > 1 )
>  gf1 = 0.000000 ;
>   gf2 = 0.350000 ;
>  gf3 = -0.962587 ;
>   rf2 = 0.049835 ;
> #end
>
...

> Each clock second could be represented by a frame, and well that code you
> see there, is the one i used for a aircraft animation of course its like
> clock > 120  (long) i put it as example.
>
> And this would be a mesh structure for that code:
>
> #declare F5 = mesh {
>    smooth_triangle { <-1.08479, -0.0862892, -2.37674>, <0.999839,
> -0.0137941, -0.0114426>, <-1.08218, 0.107456, -2.38276>, <0.999839,
> -0.0137941, - 0.0114426>, <-1.10685, 0.0503131, -4.46911>, <0.999899,
> -0.0127858, - 0.00616726> }
>    smooth_triangle { <-1.10685, 0.0503131, -4.46911>, <0.999899,
> -0.0127858, -0.00616726>, <-1.11227, -0.129925, -5.37924>, <0.999918,
> -0.0122813, - 0.00352831>, <-1.08479, -0.0862893, -2.37674>, <0.999804,
> 0.0174006, - 0.00940568> }
>    smooth_triangle { <-1.10721, -0.00928228, -5.37859>, <0.999117, -
> 0.0419519, 0.00235229>, <-1.11227, -0.129925, -5.37924>, <0.999918, -
> 0.0122813, -0.00352831>, <-1.10685, 0.0503131, -4.46911>, <0.999899, -
> 0.0127858, -0.00616726> }
> }
> object { F5 material { F5Material }
> rotate <rf1, rf2, rf3>
>    scale <hf, hf, hf>
>    translate <gf1,gf2,gf3>
> }
>
> The frames could be represented by a Slider or ruler or something.
> And  making checkpoints, then doing the proper math.
>
> well, something like that.
>
> And that 3D freeview thingy, it would be nice, but!, it would need some
> intresting vector math. (for the proportions of how the mouse will move the
> object withing the angle).
> And well if someone is willing to do it, i would like to help with the
> math.
>
> I was reading about the new KDE coming, well, it would be a nice surprice.
>
> I think i drank too much caffeine.
> Have a nice day fellows.
>
> Miguel Angel Gómez - Engrane
>
> ::Be Elite::

-- 
Möchtest du wissen, was Pinguine mit Computern zu tun haben?
Dann schau' doch mal bei der Linux-AG rein: http://people.freenet.de/NSchwirz