[kplato] koffice/kplato

[Thomas Zander]

On Wednesday 23 November 2005 08:45, Dag Andersen wrote:
> > I sure see the filename = classname rule is a valid argument to
> > keep (revert to) the prefix - as filenames will (in any case) keep
> > their prefix. But then, there is only the prefix difference between
> > filename and class, right?
>
> This was why I (slowly) topled over to maybe keeping it, but I'm not a
> stickler for these types of things...

In KWord we renamed all files to 
a) use the .cpp
b) use the classname exclusively
c) don't use lowercase due to readability issues; so its Task.cpp

In KPresenter this is also going to happen as soon as someone writes the 
script to do so.
In Koffice-libs we will probably do the same thing. But thats a lot of 
work.

Maybe its an idea to follow this format if there is going to be any 
renaming in kplato.

-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kplato/attachments/20051123/60711999/attachment.pgp