[kplato] Fwd: Re: [kproject] Planning and Analysis 101

[Brad Hards]

Anders Johansson wrote:
> 
> You miss the point. It isn't whether *we'll* develop in CVS, but rather what
> built-in versioning system the product will use to manage the documents
> produced by its users.
I think that versioning support is critical, but that it is inappropriate to
do it natively. In the typical project example of versioning (contract
change), there is a lot more that needs to get "configuration managed" or
"versioned" than just the scheduling / planning tool. For example, the change
pages for the contract, the subcontracts, the cost breakdowns, the engineering
changes, etc, etc, etc.

It should be supported at a KOffice level, rather than a kplato level or a
task/subproject level.

Brad