[kplato] Functional Breakdown (comments)
Chris Herrnberger
kplato@kde.org
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:20:16 -0400
On Monday 18 June 2001 20:03, Anders Johansson wrote:
> These are clearly separate tasks, since it's not the same tire. They cannot
> be the same task, since installing one tire does not mean that the other
> one is also installed.
>
> A better example might be if you're running two projects on the same
> platform, and there's a bug discovered on that platform (the scenario
> actually occurred in the project I'm in now). Both projects will then
> depend on that bug being fixed, and there you have a task that can belong
> to two projects.
>
And the project manager who is charge of product development would not make
that disctintion as he manages one project, all projects, same as the CEO and
controller.
OK IM starting to get it. You lads are clearly using programming logic here,
and or industry specific (software/hardware practices) not general user
logic. Non issue, just need to sort the terms and their usage in my own mind.
The work I do these disctinctions as described would not reflect our working
reality nor the manner in which we would manage the project. That is not to
say it is either is wrong. This form of logic does have an impact though on
the apps design.
Perhaps a glossary of terms where such terms are defined: ie: project, would
help non programmers such as me.
Best and many thanks
Chris h