[kplato] Functional Breakdown (comments)

[Jim Sabatke]

You hit it right on the nose.  That is a much better explaination than I 
gave.  Thanks!

Jim

Chris Clarke wrote:

>On Monday 18 June 2001 16:18, Chris Herrnberger wrote:
>
>>Thanks for the clarification but from a user perspective the later
>>definition does not make hay at this end. Can you expand on this a little.
>>
>
>Here's my take on what's going on with the difference between subtasks and 
>subprojects (if I understand the discussion correctly).
>
>Let's say we have two projects being developed:  project A and project B.
>
>Both projects rely on the completion of a certain set of tasks in their 
>schedule.
>
>Since a task cannot belong to two projects, we define these tasks as a new 
>project called project C.
>
>Project C can now be added as a subproject to both A and B, indicating the 
>dependency in their schedules.
>
>Am I close?
>
>Chris C.
>

-- 
Jim Sabatke
SuSE 7.1 Linux
Kernel - 2.4.0
http://www.execpc.com/~jsabatke

"People tell me that I'm fading fast, that I can't last the whole night through" Janis Ian