[KPhotoAlbum] Inefficiency in ImageSearchInfo::match()
Johannes Zarl
isilmendil at gmx.net
Tue Sep 11 12:58:21 BST 2012
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 12:53:57 Jesper K. Pedersen wrote:
> On Sunday 09 September 2012 20:07:34 Robert Krawitz wrote:
> > Is there any reason it does this rather than simply return if any of
> > these tests fail?
>
> I'm 99% sure that &= will not evaluate the right side if the left side
> already is false.
C++ actually has to evaluate the right side of the code. The arguments of the
operator&= are evaluated before operator&= is called.
Short example:
cat > test.cpp <<EOF
#include <iostream>
bool trueFunction()
{
std::cout << "trueFunction called." <<std::endl;
return true;
}
int main() {
bool b= false;
b &= trueFunction();
std::cout << "b is: " << ( b ? "true" : "false" ) << std::endl;
return 0;
}
EOF
g++ -o test test.cpp
./test
trueFunction called.
b is: false
Cheers,
Johannes
More information about the Kphotoalbum
mailing list