[KimDaBa] Re: kimdaba: why not join forces with gwenview

[Aurélien Gâteau]

> > Well KimDaBa do contain much more information, so I need some extension
> > compared to digikam, on the other hand I do not have a concept of albums,
>
> Call the collection of images matching the search criteria a 'virtual
> album' ;)

Yes, that's what I was thinking of implementing in Gwenview.
>
> > so the system can't be completely the same
>
> Yes, but for another reason.  digikam plugin interface currently
> leaks the implementation of albums is a folder.  But with an adaption
> (or redesign)  there no reason why the plugins system can be extended
> adapted to fit the need of kimdaba, digikam, gwenview ...

Sorry, didn't understand the "leak" part :(


> Only problem can be developers not discussing with each other ;)

You're right :-). Maybe we can continue this discussion on the digikam-devel 
mailing list? This seems the most appropriate to me.

Regards,
  Aurélien