[Konversation-devel] [Bug 126566] New: Half-hop status is not properly recognised

[Florent Bruneau]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126566         
           Summary: Half-hop status is not properly recognised
           Product: konversation
           Version: 0.19
          Platform: Gentoo Packages
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: NOR
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: konversation-devel kde org
        ReportedBy: florent.bruneau_kde polytechnique org


Version:           0.19 (using KDE KDE 3.5.2)
Installed from:    Gentoo Packages
Compiler:          gcc 4.1 
OS:                Linux

In user list, half-ops appears without any kind of op privileges and their surname have a %
eg :
%Schmurtz
%Ey

Other kinds of privileges are displayed as expected.

Here is a patch to correct this :
diff -ur konversation-0.19/konversation/src/server.cpp konversation-0.19.new/konversation/src/server.cpp
--- konversation-0.19/konversation/src/server.cpp   2006-01-30 09:43:46.000000000 +0100
+++ konversation-0.19.new/konversation/src/server.cpp   2006-05-01 15:08:52.000000000 +0200
 @ -195,8 +195,8  @
     m_socket = 0;

     // TODO fold these into a QMAP, and these need to be reset to RFC values if this server object is reused.
-    serverNickPrefixModes = "ov";
-    serverNickPrefixes = " +";
+    serverNickPrefixModes = "ovh";
+    serverNickPrefixes = " +%";
     channelPrefixes = "#&";

     timerInterval = 1;                            // flood protection
 @ -498,7 +498,7  @
             QString::number(m_serverGroup->serverByIndex(m_currentServerIndex).port()));

         // set up the connection details
-        setPrefixes("ov"," +");
+        setPrefixes("ovh"," +%");
         statusView->appendServerMessage(i18n("Info"),i18n("Looking for server %1:%2...")
             .arg(m_serverGroup->serverByIndex(m_currentServerIndex).server())
             .arg(m_serverGroup->serverByIndex(m_currentServerIndex).port()));