[Konversation-devel] Stating the obvious
Ivor Hewitt
ivor at ivor.org
Mon Oct 10 23:26:28 CEST 2005
?smail Dönmez wrote:
> Hi fellows,
>
> Konversation on SVN is broken due to KConfigXT changes. I don't think
> staying broken will help konversation and hurts 0.19 release very much.
> Now I have no idea how KConfigXT works. So I wonder if anyone is working
> on fixing KConfigXT support in konversation ? If not I will either revert
> to old state where Konversation was working and make a release. After that
> we can try to get KConfigXT done again. Or (unlikely) I will sit down and
> fix it myself but I am busy with my daily job and university.
>
> Tell me what you think.
>
I'd say don't revert (although I just noticed on kde-commits you seemed to
have removed one of the few bits of config that had been fixed for
kconfigxt). I made a small start porting my favourite feature :) (hey I can
never decide where to put the osd so I'm always moving it about), but I've
been sidetracked/way too busy to continue. I'll try and really made a
concerted effort to knock off some more bugs. Having said that do we have a
kconfigxt expect about? For example I couldn't find a simple way to get a
font from the kconfig font entry... I assume it must be easy to do since
kconfig writes the config file setting, but I couldn't see an example
anywhere and when I asked, noone had an idea.... (so I left it commented
out).
I think we just need a definitive list of every single individual config
todo on the wiki page (I think someone made a start but it didn't get
updated) and then tick them off as they get done.
Cheers,
Ivor.
More information about the Konversation-devel
mailing list