[konsole] [Bug 430036] konsole no-toolbar setting missing or forgotten

[Duncan]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430036

Duncan <1i5t5.duncan at cox.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|konsole repeatedly losing   |konsole no-toolbar setting
                   |no-toolbar setting          |missing or forgotten

--- Comment #39 from Duncan <1i5t5.duncan at cox.net> ---
(In reply to Adam Batkin from comment #38)
> (when you do a search for "toolbar" with product=konsole, it appears that
> there are no relevant issues, since all of the closed ones are filtered out,
> and - from the title - this one does not appear relevant)

[Original bug filer, here.]

Hmm... Personally, I'd take a look at pretty much anything with "toolbar" in
the title/summary...  Even if it's not the same bug it's invariably interesting
and I find the often different use-cases educational.  And of course I always
search on closed bugs too (and sort by bug number or last modified, ignoring
obviously too old bugs), /especially/ if I'm running a release version (instead
of the live-git I run for kde) since with a bit of luck it's already fixed in
git and I can simply apply the fixing commit as a patch (easy enough on gentoo,
where the normal case is building updates from source, and applying a patch is
a simple matter of dropping the patch in the appropriate dir to be
auto-applied), but with two decades of running distro-testing releases and
perhaps a decade running selected upstream pre-releases and live-git, with a
bug-searching/filing history to match, I suppose I have a bit more experience
than most.

Meanwhile, this bug report actually ended up conflating (at least) two konsole
toolbar bugs.  It was originally filed (with a then-accurate title/summary)
long before the missing-setting bug, which got duped to the existing
won't-remember bug even though they're technically related but different bugs. 
Arguably they should have stayed separate.

But irrespective of that, you remain correct that the existing title doesn't
reflect the now-reality of the conflated and duped bugs.  And as the original
filer I /do/ have the right to change it. =:^) How about this new one?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.