D16134: Secure history file

[Pino Toscano]

pino added a comment.


  In D16134#343445 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D16134#343445>, @langbeck wrote:
  
  > @pino, but you had just said that "KF5 plasma does not use **qca**, the code for that **was dropped as dead/unmaintained**".
  
  
  I meant that the code that in plasma 4 used qca was removed, because //that code// was unmaintained.
  
  > I just thought in using OpenSSL directly because you said that.
  
  Definitely not what I meant.
  
  > So, should I use QCA or not?
  
  If you need crypto, yes.
  
  > And, if `libqt5network5` is already using it then we should not have "licensing burdens", right?
  
  That is another story (dynamic loading of openssl at runtime).
  
  In D16134#350909 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D16134#350909>, @langbeck wrote:
  
  > Since nobody seems to see/understand the importance of this patch:
  >  Should I go ahead and abandon this revision?
  
  
  There were changes requested, and they are not done. I'd start by doing the changes according to the reviews.

REPOSITORY
  R319 Konsole

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D16134

To: langbeck, tcanabrava, hindenburg, #konsole, sandsmark
Cc: langbeck, ngraham, sandsmark, pino, frederico, konsole-devel, maximilianocuria, hindenburg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/konsole-devel/attachments/20181030/de14f8c4/attachment.html>