[Bug 214987] New: extra or missing files when comparing two directories
jay
plainj at ieee.org
Tue Nov 17 16:55:59 CET 2009
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214987
Summary: extra or missing files when comparing two directories
Product: kompare
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: NOR
Component: general
AssignedTo: kompare-devel at kde.org
ReportedBy: plainj at ieee.org
Version: 3.5.4 (using 4.2.2 (KDE 4.2.2), Kubuntu packages)
Compiler: cc
OS: Linux (i686) release 2.6.28-15-generic
This concerns the way kompare treats extra or missing files when
comparing
two directories. The way I am trying to use it is to compare present website
contents with an earlier version of the website.
Consider an extra file (which occurs when one edits and old file "foo"
and
does not erase the foo~ file that an application such as emacs creates.
Kompare finds and reports the differences in the old and new foo correctly,
but then goes on to report that all of lines in the new foo~ file are
different
than the "lines" in the non-existent "foo~" file in the old directory.
It would be more helpful if it were reported (in addition to the old and
new
foo file differences) that there was an extra file in the new version of the
directory named "foo~" and of course where it is located.
There is a more serious consequence of the present kompare in the
following case(s).
Consider the addition of an new symbolic link in the new version of
the directory (a symbolic link to a file outside the present directories
being compared). Ie. in directory old there is no
symbolic link, but in the new there is. (Eventually when the directory is
burned to a CD, or moved to the location of the active website, the linked
file will get included, but prior to that there is just a new "symbolic link"
file. Presently kompare reports that it cannot parse the new file. But as
this
is a new "file" it needs only be reported that way. Ie. it's contents are not
of interest.
If this is a departure from the way most code developers use kompare,
then this new method of reporting could be made an option.
I am a new user of kompare, it's cool, and I do think it could be very
useful
in assuring that there are no "accidental" updates to my website directories.
If you want further clarification or discussion, please contact me at
plainj at ieee.org Thanks, Jay
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the Kompare-devel
mailing list