Payee for split small annoyance

[lp.allard.1 at protonmail.com]

Hello maillist,

I just restarted using KMM for good after a few months and noticed a small issues (?) with payees in split transactions.

It is now possible to enter different payees for the split transactions. However, since most of my transactions are done at a single payee, I usually (out of habit with the older KMM versions) enter the payee in the “main” transaction, and then populte my splits.

I noticed if I leave the payee fields empty on the splits, in the reports these splits will be reported with NO payee. IMO if the payee field is left empty KMM should automatically use the parent transction's payee. If KMM cant do this, what's the point of entering a payee in the main transaction if its necessary to enter one for each splits?

Maybe I am not getting the intention behind this behavior?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney/attachments/20251222/910ce3cc/attachment.htm>