Tags support

[Phil Richardson]

Hi Jack and Christian,

Thanks for your responses.

Good to know this problem is recognised.

Jack,

I had meant to raise this email several days ago, but refrained when I
noticed the way in which tags show to the side, so wanted to explore the
problem further before reporting.

However, the tags show to the side on a normal transaction, but not on a
split one.

On split and non-split transactions, I can type a tag in. But it will only
show to the side of a non-split.

If I submit the edited transaction, it will suggest it has gone in, but
editing it again show no tag, the tags tab shows no transaction in the
embedded ledger, and the transaction list on the account shows not "(tag)"
in brackets.



On 8 March 2016 at 22:20, Jack <ostroffjh at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> On 2016.03.07 02:55, Phil Richardson wrote:
>
>> So I finally bit the bullet and upgraded, which was not easy as it
>> involved
>> a couple of OS upgrades as well. I mainly did so for tag support.
>>
>> However, I am disappointed by it.
>>
>> It seems you can only tag transactions that are not split?
>>
>> Why is this?
>>
>> The features to tag them is present and your selection can be made, only
>> the the transaction to remain tag'less.
>>
>> I would add something to Christian's reply.  You can tag transactions
> which have multiple splits.  However, the tag can be applied only to the
> whole transaction, not to an individual split.
>
> In addition, note that after you apply the tag by typing in (or selecting
> from) the dropdown, the dropdown does go blank again, since you can add
> more than one tag to a transaction.  Once you add a tag, it is noted to the
> right of the dropdown.  Is it possible you just didn't notice the tag,
> since it was in a place you didn't expect to see it?
>
> Jack
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney/attachments/20160308/8f430936/attachment.html>