[kmymoney] [Bug 507851] New: Text search (Ctrl+F) doesn't search through transaction's memo field if written in a single split item

[surcouf]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507851

            Bug ID: 507851
           Summary: Text search (Ctrl+F) doesn't search through
                    transaction's memo field if written in a single split
                    item
    Classification: Applications
           Product: kmymoney
      Version First 5.2.0
       Reported In:
          Platform: Debian stable
                OS: Linux
            Status: REPORTED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: NOR
         Component: ux-ui
          Assignee: kmymoney-devel at kde.org
          Reporter: arnaudvillemain at gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 183779
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=183779&action=edit
.kmy file with test data for text search in transaction single split memo

SUMMARY
The Text search doesn't search through transaction's memo field if this memo is
written in a single split item.

STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. open the attached file in KMyMoney
2. go into ledger of the current account
3. see the 136 €-transaction with memo "many things for printer and office"
(transaction date is 04th August 2025) and see that it is split into two items
4. see the 27 € split having category = "Leisure" and the memo text = "new
printer cartridge"
5. press Ctrl+F. This makes the text search bar appear.
6. in the text search bar, write "cartridge"


OBSERVED RESULT
7. the search shows 0 results

EXPECTED RESULT
7. the search must show one result, the split transaction mentioned in 3.

SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
KMyMoney version > 5.2.0-2cbd7a8
OS > Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) 12 (x86_64)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
I am aware that :
1) searching through "find transaction" (Ctrl+Shift+F) does find the cartridge
split transaction.
However the Ctrl+F search is more ergonomic to me since it does not open any
additional window as the Ctrl+Shift+F does.
2) searching through Memo field from non-split transaction works well. But this
is uncomplete since sometimes the relevant text are written in the split parts
of a transaction in their memo fields.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.