Master Branch Status

Sun Nov 27 22:41:19 GMT 2022

No sign of the required file in the RPM.

https://fedora.pkgs.org/37/fedora-x86_64/libalkimia-qt5-devel-8.0.3-9.fc37.x86_64.rpm.html

**
*Brendan Coupe*
*3 at Coupe7.com*

On 11/27/22 3:32 PM, Brendan Coupe wrote:
> I don't see alkversion.h
>
> ls -l /usr/include/alkimia/Qt5/alkimia/
> total 52K
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.7K Jul 21 11:56 alkcompany.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  939 Jul 21 11:56 alk_export.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.6K Jul 21 11:56 alkfinancequoteprocess.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.4K Jul 21 11:56 alkonlinequote.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.5K Jul 21 11:56 alkonlinequotesource.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.9K Jul 21 11:56 alkonlinequotesprofile.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.2K Jul 21 11:56 alkonlinequotesprofilemanager.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.2K Jul 21 11:56 alkonlinequoteswidget.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  11K Jul 21 11:56 alkvalue.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.0K Jul 21 11:56 alkwebpage.h
>
>
> *Brendan Coupe*
> *3 at Coupe7.com*
>
>
> On 11/27/22 2:26 PM, Jack via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>> Check the content of the libalkimia-dev package for alkversion.h.  It 
>> might be in an unexpected location.  My libalkimia 8.1.1 has it in 
>> /usr/include/alkimia/Qt5/alkimia/alkversion.h.  However, it looks 
>> like KMM requires libalkimia > 5.0, so you should be ok in terms of 
>> version.
>>
>> (sorry for the other resend.  I has sent this from the wrong address 
>> and then resent that one thinking I was fixing this one.)
>>
>> On 11/27/22 15:51, Brendan Coupe via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>> qtkeychain-qt5.x86_64 was installed.
>>>
>>> qtkeychain-qt5-devel was not installed. It is now.
>>>
>>> That fixed that problem.
>>>
>>> Then it failed at 15%:
>>>
>>> ==============================================
>>>
>>> [ 15%] Building CXX object 
>>> kmymoney/mymoney/CMakeFiles/kmm_mymoney.dir/mymoneytransactionfilter.cpp.o
>>> /usr/local/src/kmm/kmymoney-2022.11.27-13.44.21-GIT-MASTER/kmymoney/mymoney/mymoneymoney.cpp:20:10: 
>>> fatal error: alkimia/alkversion.h: No such file or directory
>>>    20 | #include <alkimia/alkversion.h>
>>>       |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> compilation terminated.
>>>
>>> ==============================================
>>>
>>> dnf list installed | grep alkimia
>>> libalkimia-doc.noarch 8.0.3-6.fc35 @fedora
>>> libalkimia-qt5.x86_64 8.0.3-9.fc37 @fedora
>>> ibalkimia-qt5-devel.x86_64 8.0.3-9.fc37 @fedora
>>>
>>>
>>> *Brendan Coupe*
>>> *3 at Coupe7.com*
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2022-11-27 1:09 PM, Jack via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>>> Check for a package for qt5-keychain, perhaps qt5keychain-dev.   
>>>> The Fedora package name might be different.
>>>>
>>>> On 2022.11.27 14:55, Brendan Coupe via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>>>> I just upgraded to Fedora 37. The 5.1 branch compiles without a 
>>>>> problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I try to compile the Master branch I get the following error 
>>>>> (I did a test compile before the upgrade to Fedora 37 which seemed 
>>>>> to work fine. I never installed it / ran it so I can't be sure it 
>>>>> would run).
>>>>>
>>>>> CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:141 (find_package):
>>>>>   Could not find a package configuration file provided by 
>>>>> "Qt5Keychain" with
>>>>>   any of the following names:
>>>>>
>>>>>     Qt5KeychainConfig.cmake
>>>>>     qt5keychain-config.cmake
>>>>>
>>>>>   Add the installation prefix of "Qt5Keychain" to 
>>>>> CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set
>>>>>   "Qt5Keychain_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above 
>>>>> files.  If
>>>>>   "Qt5Keychain" provides a separate development package or SDK, be 
>>>>> sure it
>>>>>   has been installed.
>>>>>
>>>>> **
>>>>> *Brendan Coupe*
>>>>> *3 at Coupe7.com*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/14/22 2:57 PM, Jack via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022.11.14 07:25, Thomas Baumgart via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>>>>>> On Samstag, 12. November 2022 16:48:15 CET Jack via 
>>>>>>> KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>>>>>> > On 11/12/22 09:27, Thomas Baumgart via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
>>>>>>> > > [snip ...]
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> What's the best way to report these issues?  I've put some in 
>>>>>>>> Issue 61 in invent.kde.org and sent some to the mailing list. 
>>>>>>>> Do we want to broaden that issue to track all bugs in master, 
>>>>>>>> or keep that to Ledger related issues and open a separate issue 
>>>>>>>> for other bugs?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My preference would be to use separate issues for areas, e.g. 
>>>>>>> ledger, home page (which we both already have) and others. Not 
>>>>>>> sure what we can do if someone adds a b.k.o entry that rather 
>>>>>>> fits an issue on invent. Maybe close it on b.k.o and keep a 
>>>>>>> reference to it in the issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know of issue 61 for ledger issues.  Issues 16 and 18 (New home 
>>>>>> screen and New Welcome Page) are more about how things should 
>>>>>> look that tracking issues with what has already been implemented 
>>>>>> in master.  So, I don't see any issue for other areas of master 
>>>>>> development, although I agree that would be a good way to handle 
>>>>>> this.  Should I start by creating a new issue "New issues with 
>>>>>> master branch"  which can be for anything that doesn't fit other 
>>>>>> issues, and then create new issues of specific areas that have 
>>>>>> more than one item in the general issue?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 3.vcf
Type: text/vcard
Size: 173 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney-devel/attachments/20221127/920319a4/attachment.vcf>