Fwd: Retirement of Reviewboard - Transition to Phabricator

[Jack]

I see 9 open KMM reviews on ReveiwBoard.  Two are very recent, by  
Ralf.  I expect these will be completed by the time ReviewBoard logins  
are disabled on 16 September.  The others are at least 2 months old  
since last update, with one 2 years old from Allan Anderson.  I don't  
think I can judge whether any of them are still relevant enough to  
either act on, or to migrate to Phabricator.  I don't know how active  
any of the submitters are (other than Allan, who we know is deceased)  
so I wonder if it's worth making a brief comment on each that the  
review will effectively be dead if not acted on within about two weeks.

Thoughts?

Jack

On 2017.08.24 05:25, Thomas Baumgart wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> since there are some reviews still lingering around for KMyMoney on  
> KDE's reviewboard, I want to inform about an upcoming change for this  
> infra.
> 
> The list can be found at
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/groups/kmymoney/
> (make sure to select 'hide closed' to find the ones that are still  
> open).
> 
> Regards
> Thomas
> 
> ----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
> 
> Subject: Retirement of Reviewboard - Transition to Phabricator
> Date: Donnerstag, 24. August 2017, 21:07:49 CEST
> From: Ben Cooksley <bcooksley at kde.org>
> To: informing about and discussing non-technical community topics  
> <kde-
> community at kde.org>, kde-devel <kde-devel at kde.org>, kde-core-devel  
> <kde-core-
> devel at kde.org>, kde-frameworks-devel at kde.org  
> <kde-frameworks-devel at kde.org>,
> Plasma <plasma-devel at kde.org>, KDevelop <kdevelop-devel at kde.org>,  
> Calligra
> Suite developers and users mailing list <calligra-devel at kde.org>,  
> digiKam
> developers room - digiKam - Manage your photographs as a professional  
> with the
> power of open source <digikam-devel at kde.org>
> CC: sysadmin at kde.org <sysadmin at kde.org>
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The following is Sysadmin's suggested plan for the retirement of
> Reviewboard now that Phabricator is fully up and running for hosting
> of code reviews.
> 
> Phase 1: Commences September 2: All repositories are closed for
> accepting new reviews on Reviewboard. A notice is added to the top of
> the main page indicating that reviews should now be done on
> Phabricator.
> 
> Phase 2: Commences September 16: Login to Reviewboard is disabled, and
> final backups are taken. A static copy of Reviewboard is generated and
> published online, and the software itself is taken down.
> 
> The vast majority of projects should now be migrated to Phabricator,
> with only historical reviews needing to be cleaned up.
> 
> Note that due to how Reviewboard stores diffs and reproduces them for
> use, some reviews may have decayed and may no longer be readable. This
> is due to short-hashes which are used by Git/Reviewboard in diffs now
> having collisions with other commits which previously did not exist.
> Unfortunately there is nothing we can do about this.
> 
> Any comments on the above?
> 
> Regards,
> Ben
> 
> -----------------------------------------
> --
> 
> Regards
> 
> Thomas Baumgart
> 
> https://www.telegram.org/       Telegram, the better WhatsApp
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To be or not to be that is the question. - Any programmer
> knows the answer: $2B | !$2B is $FF.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>