Fwd: Retirement of Reviewboard - Transition to Phabricator

Jack Ostroff ostroffjh at frontier.com
Thu Aug 24 13:54:49 UTC 2017


I hope rbt (review board tools) will be able to work with Phabricator, or there is a replacement.

Jack

On Aug 24, 2017, 5:26 AM, at 5:26 AM, Thomas Baumgart <thb at net-bembel.de> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>since there are some reviews still lingering around for KMyMoney on
>KDE's 
>reviewboard, I want to inform about an upcoming change for this infra.
>
>The list can be found at 
>
>https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/groups/kmymoney/
>
>(make sure to select 'hide closed' to find the ones that are still
>open).
>
>Regards
>
>Thomas
>
>----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
>
>Subject: Retirement of Reviewboard - Transition to Phabricator
>Date: Donnerstag, 24. August 2017, 21:07:49 CEST
>From: Ben Cooksley <bcooksley at kde.org>
>To: informing about and discussing non-technical community topics <kde-
>community at kde.org>, kde-devel <kde-devel at kde.org>, kde-core-devel
><kde-core-
>devel at kde.org>, kde-frameworks-devel at kde.org
><kde-frameworks-devel at kde.org>, 
>Plasma <plasma-devel at kde.org>, KDevelop <kdevelop-devel at kde.org>,
>Calligra 
>Suite developers and users mailing list <calligra-devel at kde.org>,
>digiKam 
>developers room - digiKam - Manage your photographs as a professional
>with the 
>power of open source <digikam-devel at kde.org>
>CC: sysadmin at kde.org <sysadmin at kde.org>
>
>Hi all,
>
>The following is Sysadmin's suggested plan for the retirement of
>Reviewboard now that Phabricator is fully up and running for hosting
>of code reviews.
>
>Phase 1: Commences September 2: All repositories are closed for
>accepting new reviews on Reviewboard. A notice is added to the top of
>the main page indicating that reviews should now be done on
>Phabricator.
>
>Phase 2: Commences September 16: Login to Reviewboard is disabled, and
>final backups are taken. A static copy of Reviewboard is generated and
>published online, and the software itself is taken down.
>
>The vast majority of projects should now be migrated to Phabricator,
>with only historical reviews needing to be cleaned up.
>
>Note that due to how Reviewboard stores diffs and reproduces them for
>use, some reviews may have decayed and may no longer be readable. This
>is due to short-hashes which are used by Git/Reviewboard in diffs now
>having collisions with other commits which previously did not exist.
>Unfortunately there is nothing we can do about this.
>
>Any comments on the above?
>
>Regards,
>Ben
>
>-----------------------------------------
>-- 
>
>Regards
>
>Thomas Baumgart
>
>https://www.telegram.org/       Telegram, the better WhatsApp
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>To be or not to be that is the question. - Any programmer
>knows the answer: $2B | !$2B is $FF.
>-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney-devel/attachments/20170824/22edfa5b/attachment.html>


More information about the KMyMoney-devel mailing list