Compile Failure 4.8 Branch

[Jack Ostroff]

I'm still not sure what the underlying issue is, but I do see some 
things that smell suspicious to me.  These comments are as I read 
through the log.

gcc is 6.2.1.  I have no idea if anyone else is using this recent a gcc. 
  I don't think it should be a problem, but there have certainly been 
cases where a newer gcc handles something differently.

at the end of the cmake run, I don't see the usual output about the 
various things it has found.  I don't know if you snipped it or if that 
might indicate some issue with the cmake output being incomplete.

that ending seems very abrupt to me.  Try running make with a more 
verbose setting.  It normally says more about what it is actually doing. 
  No need to start from scratch, if you just run make in the existing 
build directory, it will skip the things that were done ok.

One more question - It looks like your build directory is right in the 
root of the source tree.  This is not recommended, although it often 
does work.  Try using a build directory outside the source tree.

The error does seem to be within the automoc stuff, which is just magic 
to me.  (It is also where I am currently having problems with both the 
4.8 and master branch builds in various different environments.)

Jack


On 10/14/2016 12:47 PM, Brendan Coupe wrote:
> I was running make with -j 8. I eliminated that setting and ran it again
> assuming this might show where the error is. The last part of the output
> is copies below and the full log is attached.
>
> ​​
> Scanning dependencies of target kmm_config_automoc
> [ 11%] Automatic moc for target kmm_config
> [ 11%] Built target kmm_config_automoc
> [ 12%] Generating kmymoneysettings.h, kmymoneysettings.cpp
> Scanning dependencies of target kmm_config
> [ 12%] Building CXX object
> kmymoney/CMakeFiles/kmm_config.dir/kmymoneyglobalsettings.cpp.o
> kmymoney/CMakeFiles/kmm_config.dir/build.make:70: recipe for target
> 'kmymoney/CMakeFiles/kmm_config.dir/kmymoneyglobalsettings.cpp.o' failed
> CMakeFiles/Makefile2:738: recipe for target
> 'kmymoney/CMakeFiles/kmm_config.dir/all' failed
> Makefile:160: recipe for target 'all' failed
>
>
> *
> ----
> Brendan*
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Brendan Coupe <brendan at coupeware.com
> <mailto:brendan at coupeware.com>> wrote:
>
>     I've attached the full log.
>
>     Thanks,
>     *
>     ----
>     Brendan*
>
>     On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Jack
>     <ostroffjh at users.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:ostroffjh at users.sourceforge.net>> wrote:
>
>         On 2016.10.14 08 <tel:2016.10.14%2008>:55, Brendan Coupe wrote:
>
>             ​I compared the output from the 2 systems. The line that
>             happen right
>             before it crashes​:
>
>             [ 26%] Built target kmm_kdchart
>
>             happens at 44% on the systems that completes the compile
>             process.
>
>             Not sure if that helps but it appears to be skipping something.
>
>
>
>             *----Brendan*
>
>             On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:44 AM, Brendan Coupe
>             <brendan at coupeware.com <mailto:brendan at coupeware.com>>
>             wrote:
>
>             > Doug, Thanks for your quick reply.
>             >
>             > All kdepimlibs are installed on both systems. Any other ideas?
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > *----Brendan*
>             >
>             > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:23 AM, Doug Lytle <support at drdos.info <mailto:support at drdos.info>> wrote:
>             >
>             >> On 10/14/2016 01:28 AM, Brendan Coupe wrote:
>             >>
>             >> Both systems are running Fedora 24 64 bit. I assume I'm missing a
>             >> dependency. Can anyone tell what is wrong?
>             >>
>             >>
>             >> If I recall correctly, you'll need kdepimlibs development libraries
>             >>
>             >> Doug
>
>         I wouldn't trust the % very much.  It seems very different on
>         two different compiles for me which I would expect to be much
>         more similar.  However, if you want help, you have to post the
>         actual error.  What you posted was just the final report from
>         make that it didn't succeed.  The real error is probably much
>         higher in the output.  It may still not be obvious why it
>         failed, but it will at lest tell the actual command which failed.
>
>         Jack
>
>
>