More libalkimia problems/questions was: problems compiling 4.8 on system with both qt4 and qt5

[Jack]

It took me a while to see it, but Alan is asking if LibAalkimia is correct or if each call should be LibAlkimia.  I can see how the double a could either jump out at you or simply be not noticed.

On Nov 3, 2016 3:24 AM, Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker at freenet.de> wrote:
>
> Am 03.11.2016 um 00:25 schrieb aga: 
> > I don't know if this is/these are typos or deliberate, or even if 
> > they're important, or fixed already, but, in this chunk, there are four 
> > LibAalkimiaxx's. 
> These are two variants to show how it could be performed: 
>
> variant 1: 
> > if(QT4_FOUND) 
> >>    find_package(LibAalkimia4) 
> >>    if(NOT LIBALKIMIA4_FOUND)          [1] 
> >> find_package(LibAalkimia) 
> >>    endif() 
> >> else() 
> >>    find_package(LibAalkimia5) 
> >> endif() 
> [1] for alkimia 4.3.2 package 
>
>
> variant 2 (without search for old alkimia package) 
> >> 
> >> if(QT4_FOUND) 
> >>    set(QT_SLOT 4) 
> >> else() 
> >>    set(QT_SLOT 5) 
> >> endif() 
> >> 
> >> find_package(LibAalkimia${QT_SLOT}) 
> Ralf