Review Request 126875: Combined the questions from TransactionMatcher::match and MyMoneyStatementReader::askUserToEnterScheduleForMatching

Sun Jan 24 21:44:21 UTC 2016

> On Jan. 24, 2016, 9:02 p.m., Christian David wrote:
> > kmymoney/converter/mymoneystatementreader.cpp, line 1458
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126875/diff/1/?file=439594#file439594line1458>
> >
> >     Translated strings should not be combined, as it confuses the translators. It is better to create two long strings using i18np() although this duplicates the text (which is usually bad).
> 
> Artur Puzio wrote:
>     But the i18np() is for plurals. What we can do is change the previous string only slitly to add the variable that will contain `"The transaction dates are one day apart.<br/>"` or `""`.
> 
> Christian David wrote:
>     You could use something like
>     
>         i18n("<html>KMyMoney has found a scheduled transaction which matches an imported transaction.<br/>"
>                                  "Schedule name: <b>%1</b><br/>"
>                                  "Transaction: <i>%2 %3</i><br/>"
>                                  "Do you want KMyMoney to enter this schedule now so that the transaction can be matched?</html>",
>                                  scheduleName, splitValue, payeeName);
>       
>     and
>         i18np("<html>KMyMoney has found a scheduled transaction which matches an imported transaction.<br/>"
>                                  "Schedule name: <b>%2</b><br/>"
>                                  "Transaction: <i>%3 %4</i><br/>"
>                                  "The transaction dates are one day apart.<br/>"
>                                  "Do you want KMyMoney to enter this schedule now so that the transaction can be matched?</html>",
>                                  "<html>KMyMoney has found a scheduled transaction which matches an imported transaction.<br/>"
>                                  "Schedule name: <b>%2</b><br/>"
>                                  "Transaction: <i>%3 %4</i><br/>"
>                                  "The transaction dates are %1 days apart.<br/>"
>                                  "Do you want KMyMoney to enter this schedule now so that the transaction can be matched?</html>",
>                                  gap ,scheduleName, splitValue, payeeName);

I think this code was transferred from kmymoney/dialogs/transactionmatcher.cpp lines 79-88, and now, here, I think it deals with matching a schedule.  It's a while since I was in this area, so this could be totally wrong, but I think that in the original position, it also handled matched non-scheduled and non-imported transactions.  Have you tested this capability?  If so, great and I'm wrong.

- Allan

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126875/#review91536
-----------------------------------------------------------

On Jan. 24, 2016, 8:52 p.m., Artur Puzio wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126875/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 24, 2016, 8:52 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KMymoney and Christian David.
> 
> 
> Repository: kmymoney
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Moved the question from `TransactionMatcher::match` to `MyMoneyStatementReader::askUserToEnterScheduleForMatching`.
> Added `MyMoneyTransaction & importedTransaction` parmeter to `MyMoneyStatementReader::askUserToEnterScheduleForMatching`, as `importedTransation` is required to calculate if the question from `TransactionMatcher::match` should be shown.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kmymoney/converter/mymoneystatementreader.h 80da2023490a99963b5ff85c8d77cf1d8b58bf2b 
>   kmymoney/converter/mymoneystatementreader.cpp 1634bbb37ec86d0f065a73427cd353697812c79e 
>   kmymoney/dialogs/transactionmatcher.cpp 7d9740411b96940ac848009218dce65ffaac061e 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126875/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Automated tests still pass, but they don't check the subject of work.
> Screenshot: [link](https://imgur.com/3Veh70N)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Artur Puzio
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney-devel/attachments/20160124/b0c85a63/attachment-0001.html>