[Kmymoney-devel] [kmymoney4] [Bug 337251] Can't save until default is touched

[george at wildturkeyranch.net]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337251

--- Comment #24 from george at wildturkeyranch.net ---
(In reply to allan from comment #23)
> On 29/07/14 16:38, george at wildturkeyranch.net wrote:
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337251
> >
> > --- Comment #22 from george at wildturkeyranch.net ---
> > (In reply to allan from comment #21)
> >> On 28/07/14 17:43, george at wildturkeyranch.net wrote:
> >>> Quicken (version 2011)
> >>> does not supply "L" records.
> >>
> >> I want to be clear about this point.  Are you saying that it doesn't
> >> *ever* produce "L" records, or that is doesn't the way you use it?  For
> >> instance is there any difference between how it exports a transaction
> >> that has a category, or how it exports a transaction that does a
> >> transfer to/from another, named account, or how it handles a transaction
> >> from an investment account having a brokerage account?
> >>
> >> QIF is a very loose 'standard', but Quicken itself has documented the
> >> use of "L" records, so it would be surprising if it has just dropped
> >> them altogether.  If KMM tries to cope with such a change, then the full
> >> picture will be needed.
> >>
> >> Allan
> >
> > I am only talking about the unified investment account transactions where you
> > will find 'L' records for transfers but not for the investment transactions.
> >
> > By the way, my filter supplies these and also separates investment accounts
> > into two accounts to match KMM.  Only problem I see is the DIV transactions end
> > up with the 'L' record taken as both a transfer and a cat.  Not sure what is
> > happening here.
> >
> 
> What has been the 'standard', up to now, is that in 'L' records, if the 
> 'L' is followed with a name in brackets [], then the name is an account, 
> whereas 'L' followed by a name with no brackets, then that is a category.
> 
> If your original Quicken file follows that, but gives a problem, then 
> I'd need to look at that with your file.
> 
> So far as the 'X' issue is concerned, I *could* make a change to cope 
> with that, but I'm fearful that earlier files from other users would 
> then give trouble.
> 
> Allan

The 'L' record in non-investment accounts seems fine.  I don't see 'L' records
in investment accounts except in transfer entries, e.g.:

D4/28' 6
NDiv
YFDRXX FIDELITY CASH RESERVES
CR
U180.05
T180.05
MDIVIDEND RECEIVED
^
If I add (in my 'filter') something like:

L[FIDELITY (Brokerage)]

The entry shows up in the KMM FIDELITY (Brokerage) account as I think it
should, however in the KMM FIDELITY account in the 'Edit' window it shows
FIDELITY (Brokerage) as the entry in both the Account and the Interest field.

Should I also add an 'L' record such as:
LDiv
?

Is it OK to have two 'L' records?

-- 
George

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.