[Kmymoney-devel] [kmymoney4] [Bug 321108] Cannot enter transactions without a payee

allan agander93 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 13 14:08:30 UTC 2013


https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=321108

allan <agander93 at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |agander93 at gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from allan <agander93 at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I just discovered this also affects the schedule editor. For schedules which
> transfer between two accounts why do I have to enter a payee? For scheduled
> deposits and withdrawals it is less likely that I would want to leave the
> payee blank but I would still like to have the option as it always used to
> be.

I just made a reply to your comment #1, which collided with #2, but here's my
response anyway.
"(In reply to comment #0)
> I just upgraded to latest git master and I am no longer able to enter
> transactions in the ledger without a payee. The enter button is disabled
> unless a payee is entered. By compiling earlier versions I have found that
> the bug was introduced with Allan's commit 94935cf78e. Prior to this I have
> always been able to enter transactions without a payee. This affects
> deposits, transfers and withdrawals.

I prefer to think of it as a feature, rather than a bug!  The change was made
deliberately, rather than by accident.  It came about following discovery of
several inconsistencies where the Enter/OK was not enabled when it should have
been, or vice versa.  See Bug 314955.

I did flag the issue there, and canvassed -
"
It would be good to know what fields should be regarded as mandatory for
transaction entry.  I don't know if some looseness is allowed, because of
importing, but then it is quite strictly laid out for investments.

I can see the cause of some of the symptoms I noticed, but don't know where to
draw the line."

As I got no response, I went ahead.

I couldn't really see why a payee name would not be required, but I'd be
interested to know your view.
"

So far as the last sentence is concerned, I see now your issue, and will look
into it again.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the KMyMoney-devel mailing list