[Kmymoney-devel] [kmymoney4] [Bug 240816] When editing multiple lines in an Investment Account Ledger, Value entries are reset to zero

[aga]

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:03:57 -0700
Michael Garrison Stuber <garrisonstuber at garriber.org> wrote:

> I can appreciate why Thomas would like to clean up the ledger code.
> At the same time, that sounds like it's going to be a long time
> coming.  Which version of the code line is your patch against?  Is
> there anyway I can get a copy?  Updating investment rows one by one
> gets to be painful.  It'd be nice to build a version with your patch
> in place while I wait for the long term fix.
> 
> --
> Michael Garrison Stuber

Hi Michael

The patch allowing multiple investment transaction editing is in Git
HEAD.  See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=240816 , comments 9 and
10.  It disallows editing of differing investment types, and
transaction tooltips are in part improved, although the Edit button one
is sometimes misleading.  That's as far is I've committed.

Allan


> On Apr 24, 2013, at 4:23, allan <agander93 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=240816
> > 
> > --- Comment #12 from allan <agander93 at gmail.com> ---
> > I had the patch for these issues more or less ready, but in the
> > light of this - "From: Thomas Baumgart <thb at net-bembel.de>
> > To: kmymoney-devel at kde.org
> > Subject: Re: [Kmymoney-devel] KMyMoney ledger view tooltips
> > <big snip>
> >>> More and more I get the feeling, that this whole ledger business
> >>> comes to ages. Many things have been put in there and you stepped
> >>> on another one of those features. They are around since the KDE3
> >>> days and might not have been ported to their full functioning
> >>> into KDE4. I don't want to blame anyone who worked on the KDE4
> >>> port as this was a large job by itself.
> >>> 
> >>> Before putting any more effort into getting the existing stuff
> >>> working, I suggest to re-work the whole ledger view to be based on
> >>> the MVC paradigm and use the existing Qt4 mechanisms more
> >>> effectively. I expect a performance boost of the ledger view as a
> >>> side effect, btw.
> >>> "
> > Thomas, do you wan't this to be left in abeyance, or closed?
> > 
> > -- 
> > You are receiving this mail because:
> > You are on the CC list for the bug.
>