[Kmymoney-devel] Review Request: Refactoring of matching a transaction-under-import

[Alvaro Soliverez]

I disagree. It's not about adding a non-Qt dependency, which KMyMoney
already has a few. It's about adding a new dependency without a sound
rationale, just for a convenience class that one or another developer has
grown used to.

I still don't see boost bringing in enough of an improvement to add a new
dependency here.

Besides this, my experience with boost has been horrible in the past.
Removing or adding features for minor versions, API changing, no ABI
compatibility and other stuff. It's not the kind of dependency I'd like to
maintain.

Regards,
Alvaro

On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Łukasz Maszczyński
<lukasz at maszczynski.net>wrote:

> needed for boost::optional though, and in my opinion we shouldn't get rid
> of boost just because it's n
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney-devel/attachments/20121208/f3e19652/attachment.html>