[Kmymoney-devel] Re: [Bug 241855] Reconciliation wizard fails to calculate correct difference

[Thomas Baumgart]

Hi,

on Wednesday 29 September 2010 02:33:47 Alvaro Soliverez wrote:

> It's actually simpler to me to show the date of either  a Cleared or
> empty status transaction. I leave that decision to the group.
> 
> Let me know and I'll make the change.

I see the confusion here. The term 'not reconciled' as the state information 
is probably not good and should receive another name. I propose 'None' at this 
point as the member variable is named 'm_reconcileFlag' and it would reflect 
the state of the UI that there is no flag set (not cleared and not 
reconciled).

Does that make sense?


> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:02 PM, David Houlden <djhoulden at gmail.com> wrote:
> > OK. I see where you are coming from now, thanks. However, the UI is not
> > consistent. If I use the status filter at the top of the ledger and
> > select Not Reconciled, it shows me all transactions where the flag is C
> > or empty. This is different to the definition you are using for this
> > message. Just my opinion, but I find your definition of Not Reconciled
> > very confusing. If a flag of R means reconciled then surely any value
> > other than R means not reconciled.
> >
> > On Wednesday 29 September 2010 Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
> >> There are 4 states (1 is not used)
> >>
> >> - Not Reconciled (the flag is empty)
> >> - Cleared ( C flag)
> >> - Reconciled (R flag)
> >> - Frozen (not used)
> >>
> >> This shows the oldest Not Reconciled (or not cleared, as you wish).
> >>
> >> If you right-click on a transaction, you can mark the transaction as
> >> any of these 3 reconciliation status.
> >>
> >> So, I sticked to using "not reconciled" to maintain UI consistency.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:29 PM, David Houlden <djhoulden at gmail.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > Sorry Alvaro, I'm confused now. The message is definitely not showing
> >> > the date of the oldest "not reconciled" transaction. It is showing the
> >> > date of the oldest "not cleared" transaction.
> >> >
> >> > On Wednesday 29 September 2010 Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
> >> >> This is oldest "Not Reconciled" transaction, which is a status
> >> >> different than "Cleared".
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:17 PM, David Houlden <djhoulden at gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> > On Monday 27 September 2010 Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
> >> >> >> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=241855
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Alvaro Soliverez <asoliverez at kde.org> changed:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>- --- --- --- Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
> >> >> >>          Resolution|                            |FIXED
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --- Comment #12 from Alvaro Soliverez <asoliverez kde org>
> >> >> >>  2010-09-27 22:35:13 --- SVN commit 1180385 by asoliverez:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Set the start balance of the reconciliation wizard to read-only,
> >> >> >> and add a label with the date of the oldest not reconciled
> >> >> >> transaction.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> > I don't think this is quite right. The label is actually showing
> >> >> > the date of the oldest not cleared transaction.
> >> >> > Regards,
> >> >> > Dave.
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > KMyMoney-devel mailing list
> >> >> > KMyMoney-devel at kde.org
> >> >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > KMyMoney-devel mailing list
> >> > KMyMoney-devel at kde.org
> >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > KMyMoney-devel mailing list
> > KMyMoney-devel at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> KMyMoney-devel mailing list
> KMyMoney-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
> 

-- 

Regards

Thomas Baumgart

GPG-FP: E55E D592 F45F 116B 8429   4F99 9C59 DB40 B75D D3BA
-------------------------------------------------------------
Windows is not the answer. It's the question. The answer is no!
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 225 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney-devel/attachments/20100929/e6063588/attachment-0001.sig