KMDI2

Christoph Cullmann cullmann at babylon2k.de
Sun Apr 24 17:42:36 CEST 2005


On Sunday 24 April 2005 15:29, Andras Mantia wrote:
> As Kate uses it's own kmdi like library now, do we need to keep KMDI2?
> Of course if the headers for it are installed, we should, but otherwise
> it just confuses everybody.
as the headers get installed, we need to keep it for kde 3.5, but for kde 4.0, 
feel free to delete it, seems to be a wasted try to fix some stuff by 
reducing the complexity, as the real probs came out of the kdockwidget area

cu
Christoph

-- 
Christoph Cullmann
KDE Developer, kde.org Maintainance Team
http://www.babylon2k.de, cullmann at kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmdi-devel/attachments/20050424/258fe68c/attachment.pgp


More information about the Kmdi-devel mailing list