Report about compilers available for Krita
Dmitry Kazakov
dimula73 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 19 08:11:47 BST 2021
Hi, all!
I spent last week testing different compilers on Linux and Windows. I
decided to gather all the information I found in a nice report so we could
reuse it later :)
Report about compilers available for Krita
==========================================
Linux
-----
1) Ubuntu 16.04
* uses GCC 5.5.0 by default
* has GCC 9.4.0 available via `ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test` repository
- GCC 9.4.0 gives 10-30% better performance on Linux (I have tested on
both, Intel and Ryzen7)
- I have already switched our AppImage builds to use GCC 9.4.0
2) Ubuntu 20.04
* uses GCC 9.3.0 by default
* has GCC 11.1.0 available via `ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test` repository
- GCC 11.1.0 gives almost the same performance as 9.4.0 (about 2%
better though)
- GCC 11.1.0 needs our deps patched a bit, because of changes in
include header dependencies. In practice, you just need to add `#include
<limits>` here and there.
- The patches that fix deps compilation on GCC 11.1.0 have already
been pushed to master
Windows
-------
1) MinGW64-builds (the ones we use atm)
* uses GCC 7.3.0
* works somewhat fine
2) TDM-GCC (https://jmeubank.github.io/tdm-gcc/)
* uses GCC 10.3.0
* compiles Krita and its deps fine
* (!) causes speed regressions in the brush benchmarks
* (!) the compiler itself is 32-bit, so it might be not very efficient
on 64-bit devices
3) MSYS (msys2.org)
* uses GCC 10.3.0
* the compiler is 64-bit, which is good
* when installing MSYS-MINGW64 one must skip installing GDB, because it
requires Python, which conflicts with Krita's python
* (!) has three libraries dynamically linked to GCC, which conflict with
Krita's deps:
- expat
- iconv
- zlib
Compiling of these deps should be manually patched out from Krita's
deps (they are listed as deps to other deps)
* (!) drmingw fails to build (though I guess it is solvable)
* (!) compilation script of SIP and PyQt should be patched to use
`--install-base` instead of `--prefix`. I don't know why.
* (!) still causes the same regressions in the brush benchmarks
* (!) when packaging, Krita package fails to run on another system
because of the absent zlib, libintl and expat. Perhaps they should be added
to teh package manually. I didn't try it though.
Raw data of the benchmarks can be found here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mvTC3Ny73_0F35MscUZBHyYCXRfoX06so5zI5LL2DqU
--
Dmitry Kazakov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20210819/d35f5bde/attachment.htm>
More information about the kimageshop
mailing list