The resource bundle and resource md5 sums.

[Wolthera]

Oh. That's weird, because they do have a filename, otherwise they can't
show up in the resource manager... maybe this is just the internal
reference to the filename...

I gues the question is whether we should bar these two gradients? I think
they are exceptions to the rule.
Op 21 jan. 2015 15:48 schreef "Stefano Bonicatti" <smjert at gmail.com>:

> 2015-01-21 15:07 GMT+01:00 Wolthera <griffinvalley at gmail.com>:
>
>> >2-3 Though do no solve the problem that arise when there's no original
>> file, so when the resource is only in memory and >it's representation can
>> be different (when the resource is reloaded), from user to user. I think
>> it's not solvable if not doing >something like in point 1, or simply being
>> sure to have files for everything.
>>
>> Actually, users can't put unnamed(thus fileless) resources into bundles
>> anyway, so I wouldn't worry about that.
>>
>> I am pro-solution 2. But mostly I am pro-getting-it-to-work.
>>
>
> As far as i know, Foreground to Background gradient and the opposite
> doesn't have any standard file but you can put them into the bundle as a
> file.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Krita mailing list
> kimageshop at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20150121/8223935f/attachment.html>