Vc branch ready for testing

JL VT pentalis at gmail.com
Tue Sep 11 10:21:11 UTC 2012


I have overclockable memory but I'm fairly sure we are not bottlenecked by
memory, nowadays nearly nothing is.

But I can still test, I can test at 1333 mhz and 1866 mhz (just an example)
and see if there is a chance. Is there any other way to check for a memory
bottleneck?
On Sep 11, 2012 2:52 AM, "Boudewijn Rempt" <boud at valdyas.org> wrote:

> On Tuesday 11 September 2012 Sep, Sven Langkamp wrote:
>
> >
> > I have done a quick experiment to test that in
> > branch krita-multithreadedfixedbitblt-langkamp. Stroke benchmark is
> > slightly faster and I measured that the time fixedBitBlt went down
> (haven't
> > done detailed testing, but is looks like a speedup of 1.6). I didn't
> notice
> > any improvements while painting though. Would be interesting to see if it
> > give bigger improvements on a quad-core (no extra libs required).
> >
> > I'm more and more wondering where all the performance goes.
> >
>
> Maybe memory io? I mean, we must have awful cache locality throughout
> Krita.
>
> --
> Boudewijn Rempt
> http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl
> _______________________________________________
> kimageshop mailing list
> kimageshop at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20120911/b634abcd/attachment.html>


More information about the kimageshop mailing list