Beta 2 tagging delay

[Cyrille Berger Skott]

Thanks.

On Friday 30 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 29 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday 29 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > > > > > So any objection to the revert of
> > > > > > > ef3277a2bd7dd0b9454114d1562b633dff47c86e ?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yes, I prefer to delay the tagging of the beta release, instead
> > > > > > of causing a mess for the krita developers by reverting a huge
> > > > > > merge.
> > > > > 
> > > > > There are only two commits after that from krita developers, so
> > > > > they can be moved to the "krita-bugfixhere" branch, with all krita
> > > > > development. Also I was under the impression that everybody agreed
> > > > > that a commit that breaks, should either be fixed ASAP or reverted
> > > > > ?
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, we want to fix it ASAP. That's what I'm telling you.
> > > 
> > > Okay, I might have a temporary patch, but it needs to be tested... I
> > > think it's the progress updater that is causing the hangs, but it's
> > > just a hunch and I just tried to paint for five minutes and didn't get
> > > a hang. I have no theory about why or what.
> > 
> > Scratch that -- apparently it differs which brush we're using.
> > Z-t-speed_dirty_square still makes the painting part of Krita hang.
> 
> Dmitry committed a past last night I knocked up last night which disables
> progress reporting. For me, this seems to really "fix" (or rather, avoid)
> the hang. It needs more testing, but I am reasonably confident that with
> this patch enabled 2.4b2 can, after all, be tagged today.


-- 
Cyrille Berger Skott