Action plan 2

[Sven Langkamp]

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Cyrille Berger <cberger at cberger.net>wrote:

> On Wednesday 19 May 2010, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > Even the Krita behaviour isn't very logical. Why do I have to erase on
> the
> > transparency mask to hide some area?
> Well I mentioned that the ability to paint transparency would be a nice
> feature, didn't I ? As for logic, well without a mask you use the eraser to
> hide some area, so that means masks would work the same way as normal
> layer.
>

You erase on the mask, so the erase should make a hole into the mask where
the layer shines through.


> > Transparency is needed to indicate that a certain piece of the mask
> > shouldn't be affected. For example if you have a mask and I want the top
> > less selected, the middle unchanged and the bottom more select, then I
> > could control the changed area with the alpha channel while the other
> > "color" channel would control the direction (more or less selected) of
> the
> > change.
> I don't understand what you mean. You want a two channels masks ?
>

No, the result is still one channel but the gradient would have two
channels.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20100520/d51ff6b1/attachment.htm