Action plan 2

[Sven Langkamp]

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Cyrille Berger <cberger at cberger.net> wrote:

> On Monday 17 May 2010, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 May 2010, LukasT.dev at gmail.com wrote:
> > > What is switching to grayscale? Something like 16-bit depth? Or instead
> > > of QImage RGB use Grayscale?
> >
> > No, right now if you edit a mask you do it using the alpha channel. Users
> > expect to use grayscale for that -- this is a refactor that has been
> > discussed before.
> Did we took a decision, I think  we sort of say that we would talk about it
> at
> the meeting... and did not. Because if we follow people expectation, we
> will
> just make a clone of photoshop ;p (I wonder what the gimp people are going
> to
> do in gegl on that aspect)
>
>
I think it makes no sense to not do it that way because Photoshop does it. I
think that the grayscale version has some advantages over the current
solution, e.g. gradients work better. Both version have their problem. I'm
open for suggestions, but I think there is no ideal solution.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20100518/66f498b1/attachment.htm