Yet another bug. This time filters vs selections

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Dmitry Kazakov wrote:

> > > Again. That is a binary transparency iteration that is not good itself.
> > We
> > > need a full-featured transparency with 256 levels of transparency.
> > >
> >
> > We have that. Apart from isSelected(), the iterator also provides
> > selectedness() which returns those levels.
> >
> 
> Don't you suggest filtering layers pixel by pixel? =)

Sorry, I don't follow? 

Boudewijn