The future of Airbrush

[LukasT.dev@gmail.com]

I will work on the feature 'very small particles'. Idea is to spray particles 
with size less then 1 px and represent that kind of particle with alpha 
decreased according its size.

Anyway how about actual Airbrush? The conclusion is to leave it as it is or 
move airbrush as option to Pixel Brush?

On Saturday 02 May 2009 00:37:12 Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> >> The main difference with spray and airbrush is that while an airbrush
> >> sprays, too, it sprays particles that are generally too small to see :-)
> >
> > I'm used to being able to see the individual drops (at least where the
> > spray density is low) :-). They're just really, really small. Point
> > being, an airbrush tool that isn't particle-based is really an incorrect
> > oversimplification. (Painter's airbrush is particle-based IIRC.)
>
> I should qualify that with "but we still want such a tool", since I am
> assuming Krita does not want to forsake the digital painting style.
> (Just because "digital" brushes are not an accurate simulation of real
> media doesn't mean they don't have their place, of course.)
>
> That said, I wouldn't object to adding an "airbrush mode" to the regular
> "digital" paintbrush, the way PS did in 6->7.
>
> --
> Matthew
> Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20090502/38800e84/attachment.htm