per-pixel random problems?

[Matthew Woehlke]

Cyrille Berger wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> Well, what I did for my plasma stand-alone is run (x%5 + y%37)
>> iterations. It seems to give an acceptable result, but it's relatively
>> expensive :-).
> 
> because it recomputes all values until (x%5 + y%37)...

Um... yes? That's what I was trying to say.

Not looping gives results that are obviously non-random. I solved that 
by looping for (x%5 + y%37) iterations, however that is obviously an 
inelegant solution because it is expensive.

-- 
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
-- 
|-\ /-\ \ | -+-   |-\  +  \ | -+- /-\
| | | | |\|  |    |-/ /-\ |\|  |  |
|-/ \-/ | \  |    |   | | | \ -+- \-/