paintops

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Saturday 16 June 2007, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> On Saturday 16 June 2007, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > Sounds good. (I'm also plenty happy with the threadedness of the freehand
> > tool, btw -- seems to make a big (subjective) difference).
>
> With the brushop it does no difference :) The queue never fill with more
> than one operation.

Could that depend on the system?

> But with more expensive paintop it definitively does 
> work better. I am currently working on a smoothing algorithm for the
> freehand tool, like in photoshop.

I see your commits coming in :-). I hope to get time tonight to compile & 
start hacking again.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20070617/851ca3e9/attachment.pgp