Fwd: Re: [gnu.org #348899] GPL compatibility with CTL licence

[Cyrille Berger]

Hi,

After our discution yesterday on openexr-devel at nongnu.org, I have asked the 
opinion of licensing at fsf.org, and here is the two answers I got. So the third 
clause (patent and trademark) is not a problem with GPL. But they confirm 
that the jurisdiction clause is not compatible with GPL (or the other way 
arround ;) ).

And indeed that concern only the ctl library and not openexr which use a more 
classical BSD licence.

I am going to contact AMPAS about it and will keep you inform.

-- 
Cyrille Berger
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "Brett Smith via RT" <licensing at fsf.org>
Subject: Re: [gnu.org #348899] GPL compatibility with CTL licence
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:11:54 -0500
Size: 3630
Url: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20071207/d7a1d751/attachment.mht 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gnu.mbox
Type: application/mbox
Size: 2899 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20071207/d7a1d751/attachment.bin