Const iterators, what's next ?

[Bart Coppens]

On Thursday 19 October 2006 08:28, Casper Boemann wrote:
> First of all I don't get it. What exactly have you constified. A const
> iterator can't move so it can't be like a const class.
Well it's more to draw an analogue with C++'s const char* ptr; which you can 
still move around, but not write to (compared to char* const ptr; which you 
can write to, but not move around). It's not really the class, but the thing 
that is pointed to that is const.

Bart